MY TWO SUBJECTS OF STUDY:
SOCIETY AND GOVERNMENT
Jessica Villaseñor
100409908
In the first
annotation I explained some characteristics of women in Egypt as a clear
example of what this problematic is about. For this annotation I will go deeper
in my two principal subjects of study: Egyptian society and Egyptian
government. Thus, we can understand what the inconsistencies I argue for are
about.
This first
article analyzes the society and shows some of the current problems it faces. The
article is from the BBC, and the author, Roger Hardy, points out the
contradictions in the Egyptian society. He reviews the recent history in the
country in order to understand the feelings of the society and its "crisis
of identity" as the called it.
In contrast
to Nabila Ramdani, the author of the article I presented in the first
annotation, this author shows more understanding of the cultural particularities
when writing about the topic. First, he mentions that the signals of modernity
are undoubtedly present in Egypt, such as telecommunications. He supports this
idea after explaining the
fragmentation of society
into different groups and all of them with different solutions for this problem.
Some of them had been trying to approach to the West,
others had done a reinterpretation of the Koran (the holy book of Islam) but “in
the light of modern conditions” (Hardy, 2002),
but others had concluded that Islam has to maintain as pure as possible and
fight the battles. Therefore, with this previous explanation is it clear why the
author’s article is named “crisis of identity”.
As I explain
in the first issue paper, the government kept a pro-west policy for many years
meanwhile the society was wearing out. The actual crisis the author talks about
is the result of these inaccurate policies. This article supports my argument
about the incongruence of the real Egyptian identity and the government they
had before the Revolution in 2011. He gives us as well a context of the struggle they live
in the pursuit of their identity trough a no bias explanation.
For this
second article I want to explain the government situationThis article from The
Guardian written by Duncan Green seeks for the reasons of disconformities of
Egyptian people that may
have led to the Revolution in last year. He
mentions many but for the purpose of my research I will focus only in the
foreign policy.
As Green
(2011) says “the foreign policy had …divorced from public opinion for many
years” , he let us
comprehend the disagreement between the voice of society, the free media and
the government in recent years that led to “the erosion of legitimacy”. As example we can mention that even though Egypt’s
population is mostly Arabic, it got far from the rest of Arabic countries, and
didn’t support them in the international
scenario.
Since a
Revolution, like the one occurred last year is a large-scale event, I cannot
say that foreign policy and the delegitimization of the State are the main
causes for it. But for,
sure, as the author says is one of the causes. This article supports my idea
that the government in recent years didn’t represent the identity and customs
of society until the point that it broke down into groups that are seeking for
solutions. Turning back to the veil would be one of the signs of one of these
groups’ solutions.
Concept:
Legitimacy
Lipset’s
definition of Legitimacy involves the belief that the exiting political
institutions are the most appropriate one for the society” and Easton’s
definition is “the conviction on the part of the member that it is right and
proper…to accept and obey the authorities” (cited in Stillman, 1974) help us to better understand the political language used
in the articles above.
References
-Green, D. (17 de february de 2011). What caused the Revolution in Egypt? The
Guardian.Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/feb/17/what-caused-egyptian-revolution
-Hardy, R. (16 de july de 2002). Obtenido
de BBC News.
-Stillman, P. (1974). The concept of Legitimacy. Polity,
32-56.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3234268?seq=1
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario